Fund-vs-fund · Listed Property
Mint Australasian Property Fund vs Pathfinder Global Property Fund
Both are Listed Property funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.
| Metric | Mint | Pathfinder | Lower / higher is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fund charge | 1.04% | 1.00% | Lower is better |
| Risk indicator (1–7) | 5 | 5 | Higher = more volatility |
| 5-year return p.a. | 0.89% | 2.55% | Higher is better (past not future) |
| Fund size | NZ$19m | NZ$17m | Larger = more stable, lower close-risk |
| Growth / income split | 98% / 2% | 98% / 2% | More growth = higher long-run return + volatility |
What each fund says it does
Mint
Mint Australasian Property Fund
The Fund invests predominantly in Australasian listed property and property-related equities. The Fund is benchmarked against the S&P/NZX All Real Estate (Industry Group) Gross Index with an investment objective of outperforming the benchmark after fees and expenses, over the medium to long term.Full Mint Mint Australasian Property Fund profile →
Pathfinder
Pathfinder Global Property Fund
The Fund invests directly in listed property companies that satisfy Pathfinder’s ethical investment criteria. The Fund targets a portfolio of 50 to 100 property companies.Full Pathfinder Pathfinder Global Property Fund profile →
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal
circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.