Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Mint New Zealand SRI Equity Fund vs Smart Australian Financials ETF

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference is geographic and sectoral concentration. The Mint New Zealand SRI Equity Fund holds exclusively New Zealand-listed companies with an SRI (socially responsible investment) mandate, with its top five positions spanning healthcare, infrastructure, energy, and airports. The Smart Australian Financials ETF, by contrast, tracks Australian financial-sector stocks, with its top five holdings — Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, NAB, ANZ, and Macquarie — accounting for roughly 80% of disclosed weight. Despite sharing the same Australasian Equities category and an identical growth-assets allocation of 98.31%, these funds offer materially different geographic and industry exposures.

On risk, the ETF carries a higher risk indicator of 6 compared to Mint's 5, both on the standard 1–7 scale. The fee differential is notable: Smartshares discloses an annual fund charge of 0.54%, while Mint discloses 0.96%. The five-year return figures diverge sharply — the Smart Australian Financials ETF shows 16.31% per annum versus Mint's 0.43% — though these figures reflect different market conditions, currency movements, and sector cycles over the measured period and should not be read as predictive.

Fund size is broadly comparable: Mint at NZD 76.95 million, Smartshares at NZD 66.75 million. Neither fund is structured as a KiwiSaver scheme account product in this snapshot.

Always verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Smart Australian Financials ETF charges 0.43% lower in annual fund charges (0.54% vs 0.97%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Mint New Zealand SRI Equity Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Mint

0.97%

Lower half of cohort

Smartshares

0.54%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Mint

0.15%

Bottom 10% over 5 years

Smartshares

14.26%

Top 1% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Mint

NZ$72m

Lower half by size

Smartshares

NZ$65m

Lower half by size

Metric Mint Smartshares Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.97% 0.54% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 6 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 0.15% 14.26% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$72m NZ$65m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening Yes No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Mint

Mint New Zealand SRI Equity Fund

Typically invests in New Zealand-listed equities and has an investment objective of outperforming the S&P/NZX50 Gross Index after fees and expenses over the medium to long term. The Fund is designed to meet specific responsible investment criteria, with the aim of building a portfolio where the holdings in aggregate, generate a better ESG score in our systems than the benchmark.
Full Mint Mint New Zealand SRI Equity Fund profile →

Smartshares

Smart Australian Financials ETF

The Smart Australian Financials ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/ASX 200 Financials Ex-A-REIT Index. The Index is comprised of financial sector companies from the S&P/ASX 200 Index, but excludes Australian real estate investments trusts.
Full Smartshares Smart Australian Financials ETF profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Mint New Zealand SRI Equity Fund and the Smart Australian Financials ETF?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Smart Australian Financials ETF charges 0.43% lower in annual fund charges (0.54% vs 0.97%).
Which fund has lower fees, Mint New Zealand SRI Equity Fund or Smart Australian Financials ETF?
Smart Australian Financials ETF has the lower annual fund charge (0.54% p.a. vs 0.97% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Mint New Zealand SRI Equity Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 0.15% and Smart Australian Financials ETF's is 14.26% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — Mint New Zealand SRI Equity Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Smart Australian Financials ETF does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.