Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · NZ Fixed Interest

NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Bonds vs Russell Investments NZ Fixed Interest Fund

Both are NZ Fixed Interest funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is risk and cost. The NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Bonds fund carries a risk indicator of 4, compared to 3 for the Russell Investments NZ Fixed Interest Fund, meaning NZ Funds discloses a wider expected range of returns. Alongside that higher risk sits a substantially higher annual fund charge: 1.44% versus Russell's 0.49% — a gap of 95 basis points on funds of broadly similar size (NZ$145m versus NZ$158m) and an identical growth assets allocation of 0.07%.

The five-year return figures are close — 0.97% per annum for NZ Funds against 0.85% for Russell — though neither figure is strong in absolute terms and past returns do not indicate future performance. Portfolio composition differs meaningfully: Russell's top holdings are concentrated in New Zealand Government Bonds (NZGBs), with the five largest positions all sovereign debt totalling roughly 30% of the fund. NZ Funds' top five positions are dominated by bank-issued instruments — Westpac, ANZ, BNZ and Kiwibank — reflecting the fund's Australian bank and domestic financial-sector exposure implied by its name.

Both funds sit in the NZ Fixed Interest category and both are not KiwiSaver scheme accounts. Note that the PDS URLs in this snapshot reference different series documents (Russell's links to a Sustainable Global Shares document; NZ Funds' to an Active Growth Series document), which may indicate a data linkage issue worth checking.

Always verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this summary.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Russell Investments NZ Fixed Interest Fund charges 0.95% lower in annual fund charges (0.49% vs 1.44%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 14 nz fixed interest funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

NZ Funds

1.44%

Highest 4% of cohort

Russell Investments

0.49%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

NZ Funds

0.97%

Lower half over 5 years

Russell Investments

0.85%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

NZ Funds

NZ$145m

Lower half by size

Russell Investments

NZ$158m

Upper half by size

Metric NZ Funds Russell Investments Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.44% 0.49% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 4 3 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 0.97% 0.85% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$145m NZ$158m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 0% / 100% 0% / 100% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

NZ Funds

NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Bonds

The objective of the New Zealand and Australian Bonds fund is to generate gains by investing in income assets and other authorised assets with active management. The fund is anticipated to mainly own and trade New Zealand and Australian bonds over the minimum suggested timeframe.
Full NZ Funds NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Bonds profile →

Russell Investments

Russell Investments NZ Fixed Interest Fund

The underlying investment exposure is typically comprised of government fixed income securities, bank bills and cash equivalents, and securities issued by local authorities, semi-government organisations, and corporations, as well as to mortgage backed and asset backed securities. The underlying investment portfolio may from time to time be exposed to low grade or unrated debt securities to a limited extent, and derivatives. The fund also has the ability to invest in the Australian fixed income market either through Australian dollar denominated debt securities or
Full Russell Investments Russell Investments NZ Fixed Interest Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Bonds and the Russell Investments NZ Fixed Interest Fund?
Both are nz fixed interest funds available to NZ retail investors. Russell Investments NZ Fixed Interest Fund charges 0.95% lower in annual fund charges (0.49% vs 1.44%).
Which fund has lower fees, NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Bonds or Russell Investments NZ Fixed Interest Fund?
Russell Investments NZ Fixed Interest Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.49% p.a. vs 1.44% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Bonds's 5-year return p.a. is 0.97% and Russell Investments NZ Fixed Interest Fund's is 0.85% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.