Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian SharesvsSalt Long Short Fund

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

How much do these two overlap?

They hold 7 of the same securities. If you held both, roughly 15.0% of your money would be in the same companies — so the diversification you get from holding the pair is smaller than holding two funds suggests.

15.0%
Shared holdingNZ FundsSalt LongMin weight
Heartland Group Holdings5.21%4.15%4.15%
Tower3.71%4.51%3.71%
Turners Automotive Group2.21%4.68%2.21%
Ebos2.83%2.20%2.20%
Fletcher Building4.49%1.11%1.11%
CSL1.02%1.53%1.02%
Freightways4.54%0.56%0.56%

Min weight is the smaller of the two weightings — if you hold both funds, that is the floor of your exposure to that position. Direct holdings only: anything either fund holds through an underlying fund or ETF is not counted, so the real overlap can only be higher. From each fund's FMA Disclose full portfolio filing.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares

No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.

Salt Long Short Fund

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is how each deploys capital within the same Australasian Equities category. The Salt Long Short Fund holds only 53.15% in growth assets, with nearly half its portfolio sitting in cash and collateral positions — Cash at Bank (24.21%) and a Macquarie Collateral Account (23.43%) — reflecting its long-short strategy where collateral backing short positions is a core structural feature, not idle allocation. By contrast, NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares holds 78.48% in growth assets, with its top five positions all being named NZ and Australian equities concentrated between roughly 5% and 6% each, suggesting a more conventional long-only equity exposure.

This structural difference flows through to risk: the Salt fund carries a risk indicator of 4, while the NZ Funds offering sits at 5 on the same standardised scale. Despite the lower risk rating, the Salt fund reports a five-year return of 13.56% per annum, compared to 4.59% for the NZ Funds fund over the same period — though past returns do not predict future performance.

On fees, Salt charges 3.21% annually versus NZ Funds at 2.52%. Fund sizes are broadly comparable at approximately NZD 178 million and NZD 194 million respectively. Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account product based on the data available in this snapshot, though readers should confirm this directly.

Always verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares charges 0.69% lower in annual fund charges (2.52% vs 3.21%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 57 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

NZ Funds

2.52%

Highest 3% of cohort

Salt

3.21%

Highest 1% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

NZ Funds

4.59%

Upper half over 5 years

Salt

13.56%

Top 3% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

NZ Funds

NZ$194m

Largest 22% in cohort

Salt

NZ$178m

Largest 24% in cohort

MetricNZ FundsSaltLower / higher is
Annual fund charge2.52%3.21%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)54Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.4.59%13.56%Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$194mNZ$178mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split78% / 22%53% / 47%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

What each fund says it does

NZ Funds

NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares

The objective of the New Zealand and Australian Shares fund is to grow your investment over the long term by investing in growth assets and other authorised assets with active management. The fund is anticipated to mainly own and trade New Zealand and Australian shares over the minimum suggested timeframe.
Full NZ Funds NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares profile →

Salt

Salt Long Short Fund

The Fund aims to deliver positive absolute returns in all market environments. In addition to holding long-only New Zealand and Australian securities, the Fund may, at our discretion short sell securities, hold cash, lever its assets and utilise active currency management to generate returns (although generally will be fully hedged). The investment objective is to outperform the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Official Cash Rate +5% p.A. On a rolling three year basis.
Full Salt Salt Long Short Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares and the Salt Long Short Fund?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares charges 0.69% lower in annual fund charges (2.52% vs 3.21%).
Which fund has lower fees, NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares or Salt Long Short Fund?
NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares has the lower annual fund charge (2.52% p.a. vs 3.21% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares's 5-year return p.a. is 4.59% and Salt Long Short Fund's is 13.56% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.