Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Listed Property

Salt Enhanced Property Fund vs Smart Australian Property ETF

Both are Listed Property funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference is geographic exposure: the Salt Enhanced Property Fund holds exclusively New Zealand-listed property securities — Precinct Properties, Goodman Property Trust, Kiwi Property Group, Vital Healthcare Property Trust, and Property for Industry among its top five — while the Smart Australian Property ETF tracks Australian-listed property, with holdings such as DigiCo Infrastructure REIT, Goodman Group, and Scentre Group. An investor's return profile, currency exposure, and sector mix will differ substantially depending on which market the fund accesses.

On fees, Salt charges a disclosed annual fund charge of 1.02%, nearly double the 0.54% charged by Smartshares for the Australian Property ETF. Both funds carry identical growth asset allocations of 98.31%, but their risk indicators diverge: Salt sits at 5 on the standard 1–7 scale, while the Smartshares fund sits at 6, suggesting the latter has exhibited greater historical return volatility. Five-year returns reflect this contrast starkly — Salt's fund returned 0.27% per annum over five years against the Smartshares fund's 5.88%, though past performance does not predict future results and the periods may not align perfectly across QFUs. Fund size also differs: Salt's fund held approximately NZD 19.8 million at the snapshot date, compared with NZD 42.8 million for the Smartshares fund. A PDS URL was not available in the Salt data snapshot; the Smartshares PDS is filed on FMA Disclose.

Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Smart Australian Property ETF charges 0.48% lower in annual fund charges (0.54% vs 1.02%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 15 listed property funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Salt

1.02%

Lower half of cohort

Smartshares

0.54%

Lowest 13% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Salt

1.67%

Lower half over 5 years

Smartshares

3.03%

Upper half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Salt

NZ$18m

Lower half by size

Smartshares

NZ$23m

Lower half by size

Metric Salt Smartshares Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.02% 0.54% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 6 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 1.67% 3.03% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$18m NZ$23m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Salt

Salt Enhanced Property Fund

The Fund targets a portfolio of shares of New Zealand and Australian property trusts, companies and other property-related securities. The Fund may also, at our discretion short sell securities, hold cash, lever its assets and utilise active currency management to generate returns (although generally will be fully hedged). The investment objective is to outperform the S&P/NZX All Real Estate (Industry Group) Gross Index on a rolling three year basis.
Full Salt Salt Enhanced Property Fund profile →

Smartshares

Smart Australian Property ETF

The Smart Australian Property ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/ASX 200 A-REIT Equal Weight Index. The Index equally weights the constituents of the S&P/ASX 200 A-REIT Index, which is comprised of Australian Real Estate Investment Trusts (A-REITs) and mortgage REITs.
Full Smartshares Smart Australian Property ETF profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Salt Enhanced Property Fund and the Smart Australian Property ETF?
Both are listed property funds available to NZ retail investors. Smart Australian Property ETF charges 0.48% lower in annual fund charges (0.54% vs 1.02%).
Which fund has lower fees, Salt Enhanced Property Fund or Smart Australian Property ETF?
Smart Australian Property ETF has the lower annual fund charge (0.54% p.a. vs 1.02% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Salt Enhanced Property Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 1.67% and Smart Australian Property ETF's is 3.03% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.