Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation FundvsSmart NZ Dividend ETF

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

How much do these two overlap?

They hold 14 of the same securities. If you held both, roughly 30.1% of your money would be in the same companies — so the diversification you get from holding the pair is smaller than holding two funds suggests.

30.1%
Shared holdingSalt NZSmart NZMin weight
Contact Energy6.10%10.71%6.10%
Meridian Energy4.06%10.59%4.06%
Mercury NZ4.03%9.85%4.03%
Tower3.44%4.65%3.44%
Spark New Zealand2.66%9.70%2.66%
Heartland Group Holdings3.68%2.17%2.17%
VITAL HEALTHCARE PROPERTY TRUST1.75%2.67%1.75%
Chorus1.44%10.72%1.44%
Turners Automotive Group4.12%1.32%1.32%
Genesis Energy0.97%4.53%0.97%

Min weight is the smaller of the two weightings — if you hold both funds, that is the floor of your exposure to that position. Direct holdings only: anything either fund holds through an underlying fund or ETF is not counted, so the real overlap can only be higher. From each fund's FMA Disclose full portfolio filing.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund

Smart NZ Dividend ETF

No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their risk profile: the Smart NZ Dividend ETF carries a risk indicator of 5, while the Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund sits one band lower at 4, despite both funds allocating an identical 98.31% to growth assets. This divergence likely reflects differences in volatility of underlying holdings rather than asset allocation, and investors should examine each fund's SIPO for the precise methodology applied.

Fee structure is also notably different. Smartshares charges 0.54% per annum, while Salt charges 1.10% — roughly double. Over time, that gap compounds materially against returns. On five-year returns, Salt's fund has delivered 3.81% annually versus 3.14% for the Smartshares fund, though past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns and the period in question should be verified in each fund's latest QFU.

Portfolio construction diverges meaningfully. The Smartshares fund is concentrated in regulated utilities and telecommunications — Chorus, Contact Energy, Meridian, Mercury, and Spark together make up over 51% of the portfolio — consistent with a mechanical dividend-yield screen. Salt's fund leads with Fisher & Paykel Healthcare at 16.1%, followed by Auckland International Airport and Infratil, suggesting a dividend-growth quality tilt rather than a pure yield focus. The two funds share Contact Energy as a top holding, but otherwise offer distinct sector exposures within the same Australasian Equities category. Fund sizes are comparable: $97.3m (Smartshares) and $112.5m (Salt). No PDS URL was available in our snapshot for the Salt fund.

Verify all figures against the source PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Smart NZ Dividend ETF charges 0.56% lower in annual fund charges (0.54% vs 1.10%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 57 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Salt

1.10%

Upper half of cohort

Smartshares

0.54%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Salt

3.81%

Upper half over 5 years

Smartshares

3.14%

Upper half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Salt

NZ$112m

Upper half by size

Smartshares

NZ$97m

Upper half by size

MetricSaltSmartsharesLower / higher is
Annual fund charge1.10%0.54%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)45Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.3.81%3.14%Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$112mNZ$97mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split98% / 2%98% / 2%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

What each fund says it does

Salt

Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund

The Fund targets a portfolio of shares of New Zealand companies that may, in our opinion, pay high and sustainable dividends. The investment objective is to outperform the S&P/NZX 50 Gross Index on a rolling three year basis.
Full Salt Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund profile →

Smartshares

Smart NZ Dividend ETF

The Smart NZ Dividend ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/NZX 50 High Dividend Index. The Index is comprised of 25 high yielding companies listed on the NZX and included in the S&P/NZX 50 Index.
Full Smartshares Smart NZ Dividend ETF profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund and the Smart NZ Dividend ETF?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Smart NZ Dividend ETF charges 0.56% lower in annual fund charges (0.54% vs 1.10%).
Which fund has lower fees, Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund or Smart NZ Dividend ETF?
Smart NZ Dividend ETF has the lower annual fund charge (0.54% p.a. vs 1.10% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 3.81% and Smart NZ Dividend ETF's is 3.14% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.