Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Schroder Sustainable Global Core PIE FundvsSmart US 500 ETF

Schroder Sustainable Global Core PIE Fund (fund size NZ$946.0 million, annual fund charge 0.39%) is an international equities managed fund and Smart US 500 ETF (fund size NZ$962.6 million, annual fund charge 0.34%) is an international equities ETF, as shown on Sorted Smart Investor on 22 May 2026; Schroder Sustainable Global Core PIE Fund's 1-year return after fees and tax was 19.05% for the year to 31 March 2026, per its quarterly fund update filed on FMA Disclose.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their investment architecture. The Smartshares Smart US 500 ETF is a single-holding wrapper: 99.82% of its portfolio is invested in the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, giving investors purely passive, market-cap-weighted exposure to approximately 500 large US companies. The Schroder Sustainable Global Core PIE Fund, by contrast, holds a diversified basket of global equities selected under a sustainable investing mandate, with its five largest disclosed positions — NVIDIA (5.4%), Apple (4.72%), Microsoft (3.29%), Amazon (2.54%), and Alphabet Class A (2.13%) — reflecting direct stock ownership rather than a fund-of-funds structure.

Geographic scope also diverges sharply: the Smart US 500 ETF is confined to the United States, while the Schroder fund is global in reach. Both sit at risk indicator 5 and carry an identical growth-asset allocation of 98.31%. Fund sizes are comparable — NZD 962.6 million versus NZD 946.0 million respectively.

On fees, the Smart US 500 ETF discloses a 0.34% annual fund charge against the Schroder fund's 0.39%. On performance, the Smart US 500 ETF reports a five-year return of 14.14% per annum; the Schroder fund's five-year return figure is not available in the current snapshot, likely reflecting a shorter operating history.

Investors whose KiwiSaver scheme account or other investment sits in either fund should verify all figures against the source PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.39% vs 0.34%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Schroder Sustainable Global Core PIE Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 84 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Schroders

0.39%

Lowest 25% of cohort

Smartshares

0.34%

Lowest 23% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Schroders

—

—

Smartshares

14.14%

Top 1% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Schroders

NZ$946m

Largest 5% in cohort

Smartshares

NZ$963m

Largest 4% in cohort

MetricSchrodersSmartsharesLower / higher is
Annual fund charge0.39%0.34%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)55Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.—14.14%Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$946mNZ$963mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split98% / 2%98% / 2%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedgingUnhedged—Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningYesNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Schroders

Schroder Sustainable Global Core PIE Fund

The fund aims to provide exposure to global listed equities and is an actively managed strategy designed to target outperformance relative to the benchmark index with limited risk relative to the index. This strategy provides the benefits of index-based investing from a risk and cost perspective with the advantage of relative performance upside potential.
Full Schroders Schroder Sustainable Global Core PIE Fund profile →

Smartshares

Smart US 500 ETF

The Smart US 500 ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P 500 Index. The Index is comprised of 500 of the largest listed companies in the United States.
Full Smartshares Smart US 500 ETF profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Schroder Sustainable Global Core PIE Fund and the Smart US 500 ETF?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.39% vs 0.34%).
Which fund has lower fees, Schroder Sustainable Global Core PIE Fund or Smart US 500 ETF?
Smart US 500 ETF has the lower annual fund charge (0.34% p.a. vs 0.39% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — Schroder Sustainable Global Core PIE Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Smart US 500 ETF does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.