Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities
Smart Australian Top 200 ETFvsSmart Australian Top 20 ETF
Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.
How much do these two overlap?
They hold 22 of the same securities. If you held both, roughly 60.9% of your money would be in the same companies — so the diversification you get from holding the pair is smaller than holding two funds suggests.
| Shared holding | Smart Australian | Smart Australian | Min weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA | 10.37% | 17.05% | 10.37% |
| BHP | 9.45% | 15.55% | 9.45% |
| Westpac Banking Corp | 4.99% | 8.20% | 4.99% |
| National Australia Bank | 4.70% | 7.72% | 4.70% |
| ANZ Group | 4.00% | 6.59% | 4.00% |
| Wesfarmers | 3.06% | 5.03% | 3.06% |
| Macquarie Group | 2.64% | 4.35% | 2.64% |
| CSL | 2.52% | 4.15% | 2.52% |
| Woodside Energy Group | 2.46% | 4.05% | 2.46% |
| Rio Tinto | 2.22% | 3.65% | 2.22% |
Min weight is the smaller of the two weightings — if you hold both funds, that is the floor of your exposure to that position. Direct holdings only: anything either fund holds through an underlying fund or ETF is not counted, so the real overlap can only be higher. From each fund's FMA Disclose full portfolio filing.
Where you can buy these
Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.
Smart Australian Top 200 ETF
No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.
Smart Australian Top 20 ETF
Why these two differ
The most material structural difference between these two Smartshares funds is concentration: the Smart Australian Top 20 ETF tracks only the largest 20 Australian companies, while the Smart Australian Top 200 ETF spreads exposure across up to 200. This distinction is visible in the holdings data — Commonwealth Bank of Australia weighs 17.05% in the Top 20 versus 10.37% in the Top 200, and BHP Group Ltd sits at 15.55% against 9.45%. The Top 20's five largest positions collectively exceed 55% of the fund, creating meaningfully higher single-stock and sector concentration, particularly toward Australian financials and materials.
Both funds carry an identical risk indicator of 5 on the standard 1–7 scale and share identical growth asset allocations of 98.31%. Both are managed by Smartshares and share the same Product Disclosure Statement. Annual fund charges diverge: the Top 200 charges 0.30% per annum versus 0.60% for the Top 20 — a twofold difference that compounds over time. The Top 200 is also the larger fund at approximately NZD 331.6 million, compared with roughly NZD 208.9 million for the Top 20.
On five-year annualised returns, the Top 20 recorded 10.25% against 9.09% for the Top 200, though past performance does not indicate future performance and the periods compared may not align perfectly. Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme fund based on the data provided.
Verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.
Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.
What's different at a glance
- Smart Australian Top 200 ETF charges 0.30% lower in annual fund charges (0.30% vs 0.60%).
- Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where each fund sits in its cohort
Percentile rank vs all 57 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.
Annual fund charge
Lower is better
Smartshares
0.30%
Lowest 17% of cohort
Smartshares
0.60%
Lower half of cohort
5-year return p.a.
Past performance — not a predictor
Smartshares
9.09%
Top 11% over 5 years
Smartshares
10.25%
Top 7% over 5 years
Fund size
Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Smartshares
NZ$332m
Largest 10% in cohort
Smartshares
NZ$209m
Largest 13% in cohort
| Metric | Smartshares | Smartshares | Lower / higher is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fund charge | 0.30% | 0.60% | Lower is better |
| Risk indicator (1–7) | 5 | 5 | Higher = more volatility |
| 5-year return p.a. | 9.09% | 10.25% | Higher is better (past not future) |
| Fund size | NZ$332m | NZ$209m | Larger = more stable, lower close-risk |
| Growth / income split | 98% / 2% | 98% / 2% | More growth = higher long-run return + volatility |
| NZ tax structure | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return. |
| Currency hedging | — | — | Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost. |
| Responsible investment screening | No | No | Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO. |
| Available via | Direct | Direct | Platforms accepting retail subscriptions. |
What each fund says it does
Smartshares
Smart Australian Top 200 ETF
The Smart Australian Top 200 ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/ASX 200 Total Return Index. The Index is comprised of 200 of the largest companies listed on the ASX.Full Smartshares Smart Australian Top 200 ETF profile →
Smartshares
Smart Australian Top 20 ETF
The Smart Australian Top 20 ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/ASX 20 Index. The Index is comprised of 20 of the largest companies listed on the ASX.Full Smartshares Smart Australian Top 20 ETF profile →