Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Smart US Mid Cap ETF vs Smart US Large Value ETF

Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their underlying market segment exposure. The Smart US Large Value ETF holds approximately 99.9% of its portfolio in the Vanguard Value ETF, concentrating investors in US large-cap companies selected on value characteristics. The Smart US Mid Cap ETF holds approximately 99.92% in the Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF, targeting a different slice of the US equity market — mid-sized companies, regardless of value or growth style. These distinct underlying benchmarks drive meaningfully different return profiles despite the funds sharing the same manager, fee structure, risk indicator, and asset allocation framework.

On five-year returns, the Large Value ETF recorded 15.89% per annum against 11.73% for the Mid Cap ETF over the same period; however, past performance is not indicative of future returns, and the difference reflects the relative performance of large-cap value versus mid-cap equities across that specific window. Both funds carry a risk indicator of 5 out of 7, both sit at 98.31% growth assets, and both charge an annual fund charge of 0.51%. Fund sizes are close — NZD 54.3 million versus NZD 51.8 million respectively. Both funds share the same PDS document, confirming they sit within the same Smartshares Core Series offer. Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account product based on the disclosed data.

Readers should verify all figures against the source PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.51% vs 0.51%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 81 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Smartshares

0.51%

Lower half of cohort

Smartshares

0.51%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Smartshares

9.03%

Upper half over 5 years

Smartshares

13.03%

Top 13% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Smartshares

NZ$50m

Lower half by size

Smartshares

NZ$55m

Lower half by size

Metric Smartshares Smartshares Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.51% 0.51% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 9.03% 13.03% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$50m NZ$55m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

1

of each fund's top 10

Smartshares weight in shared

0.4%

of Smart US Mid Cap ETF top 10 is shared

Smartshares weight in shared

0.4%

of Smart US Large Value ETF top 10 is shared

Holding Smartshares Smartshares
$ NZD Cash Account (ANZ Bank) NZ
0.37% 0.37%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Smartshares

Smart US Mid Cap ETF

The Smart US Mid Cap ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. The Index is comprised of midsize US companies.
Full Smartshares Smart US Mid Cap ETF profile →

Smartshares

Smart US Large Value ETF

The Smart US Large Value ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. The Index is comprised of large US value companies.
Full Smartshares Smart US Large Value ETF profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Smart US Mid Cap ETF and the Smart US Large Value ETF?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.51% vs 0.51%).
Which fund has lower fees, Smart US Mid Cap ETF or Smart US Large Value ETF?
Smart US Large Value ETF has the lower annual fund charge (0.51% p.a. vs 0.51% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Smart US Mid Cap ETF's 5-year return p.a. is 9.03% and Smart US Large Value ETF's is 13.03% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.