Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

ACI Conservative Fund vs Fisher Funds Balanced Strategy 40/60 Fund

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material difference in this comparison is the data available for each fund. Fisher Funds Balanced Strategy 40/60 Fund discloses no fee, risk indicator, fund size, growth asset allocation, five-year return, or top holdings in this snapshot — all fields are absent from the sourced Quarterly Fund Update data. ACI Conservative Fund, by contrast, discloses an annual fund charge of 1.50%, a risk indicator of 4 (on the standard 1–7 scale), a fund size of approximately NZD 4.39 million, and a growth asset allocation of 23.37%, which sits at the conservative end of the diversified category.

On portfolio construction, ACI Conservative Fund's disclosed holdings are concentrated in fixed income: Dimensional Global Bond Sustain Trust AUD Class accounts for 42.65% of the portfolio, Dimensional Two Year Sustain Fixed Interest Trust a further 18.77%, and Cash at Bank (BNZ) 8.41%. A modest equity and real estate exposure is visible through Dimensional Global Real Estate Trust NZD Hedged Class (5.07%) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Trust AUD (4.37%). Fisher Funds Balanced Strategy 40/60 Fund's name implies a 40% growth / 60% defensive split, but no holdings or allocation data are available in this snapshot to confirm that structure.

Five-year return figures are absent for both funds, so no performance comparison is possible here. Readers should verify all figures — including fees, risk ratings, and portfolio composition — against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

ACI

1.50%

Highest 7% of cohort

Fisher Funds

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

ACI

Fisher Funds

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

ACI

NZ$4m

Smallest 10% in cohort

Fisher Funds

Metric ACI Fisher Funds Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.50% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 4 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$4m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 23% / 77% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

What each fund says it does

ACI

ACI Conservative Fund

Exposure to asset classes is achieved by primarily investing in DFA Australia Limited (Dimensional) funds, utilising their Sustainability Trusts where available. The allocations include a bias towards international diversification. Certian underlying Dimensional funds have an increased exposure to shares in small companies, value companies and companies with higher profitability with the objective of benefitting from a premium return from these companies over time. Such premiums are not always present year on year, which can drive shorter term differences in retu
Full ACI ACI Conservative Fund profile →

Fisher Funds

Fisher Funds Balanced Strategy 40/60 Fund

Strategy summary not yet ingested.

Full Fisher Funds Fisher Funds Balanced Strategy 40/60 Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the ACI Conservative Fund and the Fisher Funds Balanced Strategy 40/60 Fund?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.