Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

ACI Conservative Fund vs Fisher Funds Balanced Strategy 45/55 Fund

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference in this comparison is data availability: Fisher Funds Balanced Strategy 45/55 Fund returns no fee, risk indicator, fund size, growth asset allocation, or holdings data in our current snapshot, making a quantitative side-by-side comparison largely one-sided. Readers should treat the Fisher Funds entries here as unverified pending the latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose.

On the ACI Conservative Fund, the disclosed picture is clearer. It carries a risk indicator of 4 (on the standard 1–7 scale), an annual fund charge of 1.50%, and a fund size of approximately NZD 4.39 million — a relatively small pool. Growth assets sit at 23.37%, consistent with a conservative positioning. The largest single holding is Dimensional Global Bond Sustain Trust AUD Class at 42.65%, followed by Dimensional Two Year Sustain Fixed Interest Trust at 18.77%, with BNZ cash comprising a further 8.41%. The portfolio leans heavily toward short-to-medium duration fixed interest and cash, with modest equity and real estate exposure through Dimensional vehicles. Neither fund discloses a five-year return figure in our snapshot.

Both sit in the Diversified category. The Fisher Funds fund name references a 45/55 growth-to-income split, which would imply a materially higher growth asset weighting than ACI's 23.37%, but no QFU data is available to confirm this.

Verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

ACI

1.50%

Highest 7% of cohort

Fisher Funds

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

ACI

Fisher Funds

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

ACI

NZ$4m

Smallest 10% in cohort

Fisher Funds

Metric ACI Fisher Funds Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.50% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 4 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$4m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 23% / 77% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

What each fund says it does

ACI

ACI Conservative Fund

Exposure to asset classes is achieved by primarily investing in DFA Australia Limited (Dimensional) funds, utilising their Sustainability Trusts where available. The allocations include a bias towards international diversification. Certian underlying Dimensional funds have an increased exposure to shares in small companies, value companies and companies with higher profitability with the objective of benefitting from a premium return from these companies over time. Such premiums are not always present year on year, which can drive shorter term differences in retu
Full ACI ACI Conservative Fund profile →

Fisher Funds

Fisher Funds Balanced Strategy 45/55 Fund

Strategy summary not yet ingested.

Full Fisher Funds Fisher Funds Balanced Strategy 45/55 Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the ACI Conservative Fund and the Fisher Funds Balanced Strategy 45/55 Fund?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.