Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · NZ Fixed Interest

Amova Corporate Bond FundvsKernel March 2027 NZ Bond Fund

Both are NZ Fixed Interest funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

Amova Corporate Bond Fund

Kernel March 2027 NZ Bond Fund

No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.

Why these two differ

Both funds sit in the NZ Fixed Interest category, but the most material structural difference is the depth of available data: Kernel's March 2027 NZ Bond Fund discloses no fee, risk indicator, fund size, return history, or holdings in this snapshot, while the Amova Corporate Bond Fund (managed by Amova, distributed under the Nikko AM umbrella based on the PDS URL) provides a reasonably complete picture across all of those dimensions. Any comparison is therefore asymmetric by necessity.

On the Amova side, the fund carries a risk indicator of 3 out of 7, an annual fund charge of 0.70%, and a five-year return of 1.63% per annum as at the latest quarterly fund update. Fund size stands at approximately NZ$558 million, and growth assets represent just 0.07% of the portfolio — consistent with a near-pure income mandate. Top disclosed holdings include Housing NZ, NZ Local Government Funding Agency, Bank of New Zealand, Rabobank NZ, and Insurance Australia Group, with individual weights ranging from roughly 2.5% to 3.1%, suggesting moderate diversification across government-related and financial-sector issuers.

The Kernel March 2027 NZ Bond Fund name implies a defined-maturity bond structure — a meaningfully different design concept from an open-ended corporate bond fund — but fee, risk rating, portfolio composition, and return data are all silent in this snapshot. Investors comparing duration risk, credit exposure, or cost cannot do so on a like-for-like basis until Kernel's quarterly fund update is available.

Verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 14 nz fixed interest funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Amova

0.70%

Upper half of cohort

Kernel

—

—

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Amova

1.63%

Top 19% over 5 years

Kernel

—

—

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Amova

NZ$558m

Largest 25% in cohort

Kernel

—

—

MetricAmovaKernelLower / higher is
Annual fund charge0.70%—Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)3—Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.1.63%—Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$558m—Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split0% / 100%—More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

What each fund says it does

Amova

Amova Corporate Bond Fund

The Fund aims to outperform the Bloomberg NZBond Credit 0+ Year Index by 0.70% p.A. Over a rolling three year period before fees, expenses and taxes. The fund aims to provide investors with regular income by constructing an actively managed investment portfolio of New Zealand bonds, deposits and cash whilst preserving the capital value.
Full Amova Amova Corporate Bond Fund profile →

Kernel

Kernel March 2027 NZ Bond Fund

Strategy summary not yet ingested.

Full Kernel Kernel March 2027 NZ Bond Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Amova Corporate Bond Fund and the Kernel March 2027 NZ Bond Fund?
Both are nz fixed interest funds available to NZ retail investors. Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.