Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

AMP Balanced Managed FundvsFisher Funds Balanced Fund

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

AMP Balanced Managed Fund

No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.

Fisher Funds Balanced Fund

Why these two differ

The most material difference in this comparison is data availability: the Fisher Funds Balanced Fund snapshot contains no quantitative disclosures — fee, risk indicator, fund size, growth asset allocation, five-year return, and top holdings are all absent from our current extract. The AMP Balanced Managed Fund, by contrast, supplies a reasonably complete picture from its latest Quarterly Fund Update. Any structural comparison is therefore asymmetric, and readers should weight it accordingly.

On the AMP side, the fund carries an annual fund charge of 0.81% and a risk indicator of 4 out of 7, placing it in the middle of the standard risk scale. Fund size sits at approximately NZD 44.6 million. Growth assets make up 53.15% of the portfolio, consistent with a balanced mandate under the Diversified category. The five largest disclosed holdings span equities and inflation-linked New Zealand government bonds — Fisher & Paykel Healthcare (2.01%), a NZ Government inflation-linked bond maturing September 2035 (1.94%), NVIDIA Corp (1.67%), Apple Inc (1.47%), and a NZ Government inflation-linked bond maturing September 2040 (1.29%). Five-year return data is not available in our snapshot for either fund.

Both funds sit in the Diversified category, but because Fisher Funds Balanced Fund data is entirely absent here, no fee, risk, or allocation comparison can be drawn between them at this time.

Verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 68 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

AMP

0.81%

Lower half of cohort

Fisher Funds

—

—

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

AMP

—

—

Fisher Funds

—

—

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

AMP

NZ$45m

Lower half by size

Fisher Funds

—

—

MetricAMPFisher FundsLower / higher is
Annual fund charge0.81%—Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)4—Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.——Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$45m—Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split53% / 47%—More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

What each fund says it does

AMP

AMP Balanced Managed Fund

The fund has a well-diversified portfolio that has a balance of risk through holding growth assets and an allocation to lower-risk income assets. The fund aims to achieve medium returns, in exchange there will be some movements up and down in the value of your investments.
Full AMP AMP Balanced Managed Fund profile →

Fisher Funds

Fisher Funds Balanced Fund

Strategy summary not yet ingested.

Full Fisher Funds Fisher Funds Balanced Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the AMP Balanced Managed Fund and the Fisher Funds Balanced Fund?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.