ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Listed Property

ANZ Investments OneAnswer International Property Fund vs Pathfinder Global Property Fund

Both are Listed Property funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is risk profile. ANZ Investments OneAnswer International Property Fund carries a risk indicator of 6 (on the FMA's 1–7 scale), while Pathfinder Global Property Fund sits at 5 — a meaningful step down in stated volatility despite both funds allocating nearly identical proportions to growth assets (98.37% and 98.31% respectively). Investors should examine what drives that divergence, as it is not explained by asset-class allocation alone and may reflect differences in currency hedging, geographic concentration, or underlying security selection.

On fees, the two funds are near-identical: ANZ charges 0.99% annually versus Pathfinder's 1.00%, making this an immaterial distinction. The five-year return difference is more notable — ANZ returned 3.11% per annum against Pathfinder's 2.55% — though past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns, and the gap may partly reflect the differing risk exposures implied by those separate risk indicators.

Fund size differs substantially: Pathfinder's fund holds approximately NZD 16.8 million in assets versus ANZ's NZD 7.1 million, which may have implications for liquidity and operational scale. Both funds share overlapping top holdings — Welltower Inc, Digital Realty Trust, and Equinix — but ANZ's positions in those names are noticeably larger, suggesting a more concentrated portfolio relative to Pathfinder's more distributed top-five weightings. Pathfinder also holds NZD cash (Westpac, 5.63%) as a top-five position, which ANZ's disclosed holdings do not show.

Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this summary.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.99% vs 1.00%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Pathfinder Global Property Fund is roughly 2.3× the size of the other fund.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 15 listed property funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

ANZ Investments

0.99%

Lower half of cohort

Pathfinder

1.00%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

ANZ Investments

3.11%

Top 21% over 5 years

Pathfinder

0.80%

Bottom 4% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

ANZ Investments

NZ$7m

Smallest 3% in cohort

Pathfinder

NZ$17m

Smallest 17% in cohort

Metric ANZ Investments Pathfinder Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.99% 1.00% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 6 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 3.11% 0.80% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$7m NZ$17m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via InvestNow · Direct InvestNow · Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

6

of each fund's top 10

ANZ Investments weight in shared

38.3%

of ANZ Investments OneAnswer International Property Fund top 10 is shared

Pathfinder weight in shared

26.9%

of Pathfinder Global Property Fund top 10 is shared

Holding ANZ Investments Pathfinder
WE Welltower Inc US
9.90% 6.29%
PR Prologis Inc US
4.88% 6.82%
EQ Equinix Inc US
9.12% 4.34%
DR Digital Realty Trust Inc US
5.17% 4.03%
VE Ventas Inc US
5.03% 3.13%
UR Unibail Rodamco Westfield FR
4.23% 2.28%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

ANZ Investments

ANZ Investments OneAnswer International Property Fund

The International Property Fund invests mainly in international listed property assets. Investments may include companies, funds or trusts that invest in property and are listed or are soon to be listed, and cash and cash equivalents. The International Property Fund aims to achieve a return (after the fund charge and before tax) that over the long-term outperforms the relevant market index.
Full ANZ Investments ANZ Investments OneAnswer International Property Fund profile →

Pathfinder

Pathfinder Global Property Fund

The Fund invests directly in listed property companies that satisfy Pathfinder’s ethical investment criteria. The Fund targets a portfolio of 50 to 100 property companies.
Full Pathfinder Pathfinder Global Property Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the ANZ Investments OneAnswer International Property Fund and the Pathfinder Global Property Fund?
Both are listed property funds available to NZ retail investors. Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.99% vs 1.00%).
Which fund has lower fees, ANZ Investments OneAnswer International Property Fund or Pathfinder Global Property Fund?
ANZ Investments OneAnswer International Property Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.99% p.a. vs 1.00% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
ANZ Investments OneAnswer International Property Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 3.11% and Pathfinder Global Property Fund's is 0.80% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.