Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

Booster Socially Responsible Balanced FundvsFisher Funds Growth Fund

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund

No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.

Fisher Funds Growth Fund

What's different at a glance

  • Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund charges 0.13% lower in annual fund charges (1.33% vs 1.46%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 68 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Booster

1.33%

Highest 20% of cohort

Fisher Funds

1.46%

Highest 8% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Booster

4.00%

Upper half over 5 years

Fisher Funds

3.05%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Booster

NZ$427m

Largest 24% in cohort

Fisher Funds

NZ$319m

Upper half by size

MetricBoosterFisher FundsLower / higher is
Annual fund charge1.33%1.46%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)44Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.4.00%3.05%Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$427mNZ$319mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split54% / 46%78% / 22%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningYesNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

4

of each fund's top 10

Booster weight in shared

5.4%

of Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund top 10 is shared

Fisher Funds weight in shared

7.0%

of Fisher Funds Growth Fund top 10 is shared

HoldingBoosterFisher Funds
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation LimitedFisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation LimitedNZ
1.90%2.25%
Microsoft CorporationMicrosoft CorporationUS
1.36%1.66%
Amazon.Com IncAmazon.Com IncUS
1.12%1.16%
Infratil LimitedInfratil LimitedNZ
1.02%1.93%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Booster

Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund

The Socially Responsible Balanced Fund is suited to investors who seek a medium level of returns on average over medium term periods (five years plus), allowing for shorter-term ups and downs, whilst excluding investments which do not satisfy certain socially responsible investment criteria. We aim to achieve this by investing in a mix of income and growth assets, and the application of our Responsible Investment Policy.
Full Booster Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund profile →

Fisher Funds

Fisher Funds Growth Fund

The fund aims to grow your investment over the long term by investing in mainly growth assets
Full Fisher Funds Fisher Funds Growth Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund and the Fisher Funds Growth Fund?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund charges 0.13% lower in annual fund charges (1.33% vs 1.46%).
Which fund has lower fees, Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund or Fisher Funds Growth Fund?
Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund has the lower annual fund charge (1.33% p.a. vs 1.46% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 4.00% and Fisher Funds Growth Fund's is 3.05% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Fisher Funds Growth Fund does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.