ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund vs Harbour Sustainable Impact Fund

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

What's different at a glance

  • Harbour Sustainable Impact Fund charges 1.06% lower in annual fund charges (0.27% vs 1.33%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Booster

1.33%

Highest 20% of cohort

Harbour

0.27%

Lowest 13% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Booster

4.00%

Upper half over 5 years

Harbour

0.15%

Bottom 1% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Booster

NZ$427m

Largest 22% in cohort

Harbour

NZ$380m

Largest 23% in cohort

Metric Booster Harbour Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.33% 0.27% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 4 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 4.00% 0.15% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$427m NZ$380m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 54% / 46% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening Yes Yes Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct InvestNow · Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

3

of each fund's top 10

Booster weight in shared

4.1%

of Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund top 10 is shared

Harbour weight in shared

17.6%

of Harbour Sustainable Impact Fund top 10 is shared

Holding Booster Harbour
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation Limited Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation Limited NZ
1.90% 5.81%
Auckland International Airport Limited Auckland International Airport Limited NZ
1.18% 5.57%
Infratil Limited Infratil Limited NZ
1.02% 6.21%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Booster

Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund

The Socially Responsible Balanced Fund is suited to investors who seek a medium level of returns on average over medium term periods (five years plus), allowing for shorter-term ups and downs, whilst excluding investments which do not satisfy certain socially responsible investment criteria. We aim to achieve this by investing in a mix of income and growth assets, and the application of our Responsible Investment Policy.
Full Booster Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund profile →

Harbour

Harbour Sustainable Impact Fund

This Fund is designed to track the S&P/NZX 50 Portfolio Index, with exclusions to companies including but not limited to, large carbon emitters, gambling, firearms, and companies with human and animal rights violations. For full details of the exclusions for this Fund please see the Environmental, Social and Governance Policy (ESG Policy) on our website at Responsible Investing - Harbour Asset Management. There are positive and negative tilts applied to the remaining companies based on Harbour's proprietary Corporate Behaviour Score.
Full Harbour Harbour Sustainable Impact Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund and the Harbour Sustainable Impact Fund?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Harbour Sustainable Impact Fund charges 1.06% lower in annual fund charges (0.27% vs 1.33%).
Which fund has lower fees, Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund or Harbour Sustainable Impact Fund?
Harbour Sustainable Impact Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.27% p.a. vs 1.33% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Booster Socially Responsible Balanced Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 4.00% and Harbour Sustainable Impact Fund's is 0.15% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.