Fund-vs-fund · International Equities
Ellerston Global Mid Small Cap Fund vs Harbour Epoch Global Quality Select Equity Fund
Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.
Why these two differ
Both funds sit within the International Equities category, but their mandates point in meaningfully different directions. The Ellerston Global Mid Small Cap Fund, managed by Ellerston, targets mid- and small-capitalisation companies globally — a structurally distinct universe from large-cap equities, typically carrying higher volatility and liquidity risk alongside different return drivers. The Harbour Epoch Global Quality Select Equity Fund, managed by Harbour Asset Management in partnership with US-based sub-adviser Epoch Investment Partners, applies a quality-screen and select-portfolio approach that tends to concentrate on established, cash-generative businesses, which generally skews toward larger-capitalisation holdings. That difference in market-cap focus is the most material structural distinction between these two funds.
Beyond that mandate difference, this comparison cannot go far on numbers. For both funds, the current data snapshot sourced from FMA Disclose returns null values across every quantitative field — fee percentage, risk indicator, five-year return, fund size in NZD, and growth assets percentage. No top holdings are disclosed in this snapshot for either fund. It is therefore not possible to compare costs, risk ratings, portfolio composition, or historical performance on the basis of what is currently held here. Neither fund's PDS URL or Sorted profile link is available in this snapshot.
Given the complete absence of quantitative data on both sides, investors should treat this comparison as a qualitative mandate overview only. Always verify fees, risk indicators, returns, and fund composition against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.
Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.
What's different at a glance
- Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where each fund sits in its cohort
Percentile rank vs all 81 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.
Annual fund charge
Lower is better
Ellerston
—
—
Harbour
—
—
5-year return p.a.
Past performance — not a predictor
Ellerston
—
—
Harbour
—
—
Fund size
Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Ellerston
—
—
Harbour
—
—
| Metric | Ellerston | Harbour | Lower / higher is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fund charge | — | — | Lower is better |
| Risk indicator (1–7) | — | — | Higher = more volatility |
| 5-year return p.a. | — | — | Higher is better (past not future) |
| Fund size | — | — | Larger = more stable, lower close-risk |
| Growth / income split | — | — | More growth = higher long-run return + volatility |
| NZ tax structure | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return. |
| Currency hedging | — | Unhedged | Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost. |
| Responsible investment screening | No | No | Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO. |
| Available via | Direct | Direct | Platforms accepting retail subscriptions. |