Fund-vs-fund · International Equities
Harbour Epoch Global Quality Select Equity (Hedged) Fund vs Kernel Global ESG (NZD Hedged) Fund
Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.
Why these two differ
Both funds sit within the International Equities category and share a currency-hedged NZD structure targeting global equity exposure, but their investment philosophies represent a material structural difference. The Kernel Global ESG (NZD Hedged) Fund signals an index-based, ESG-screened approach through its name, suggesting passive or rules-driven construction filtered by environmental, social, and governance criteria. The Harbour Epoch Global Quality Select Equity (Hedged) Fund, by contrast, incorporates "Quality Select" language associated with active stock selection — in this case in partnership with Epoch Investment Partners — implying a concentrated, fundamentals-driven portfolio rather than broad market replication. This distinction in active versus passive (or semi-passive) management methodology is likely the most consequential difference for investors comparing cost, portfolio concentration, and benchmark-relative risk.
Unfortunately, the data snapshot available for this comparison is silent on both sides across every quantitative dimension: annual fund charges, risk indicator ratings, five-year return figures, fund size, and growth asset allocations are not present in the current FMA Disclose records captured here for either fund. Top holdings are similarly undisclosed in this snapshot for both. Neither fund's PDS URL nor Sorted profile link is recorded in this dataset.
Because no fee, performance, or risk figures can be drawn from this snapshot, any cost or return comparison would be fabricated and is therefore omitted entirely.
Verify all figures — including current fund charges, risk indicators, and returns — against each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz before relying on any of this.
Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.
What's different at a glance
- Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
- Kernel Global ESG (NZD Hedged) Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.
Where each fund sits in its cohort
Percentile rank vs all 81 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.
Annual fund charge
Lower is better
Harbour
—
—
Kernel
—
—
5-year return p.a.
Past performance — not a predictor
Harbour
—
—
Kernel
—
—
Fund size
Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Harbour
—
—
Kernel
—
—
| Metric | Harbour | Kernel | Lower / higher is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fund charge | — | — | Lower is better |
| Risk indicator (1–7) | — | — | Higher = more volatility |
| 5-year return p.a. | — | — | Higher is better (past not future) |
| Fund size | — | — | Larger = more stable, lower close-risk |
| Growth / income split | — | — | More growth = higher long-run return + volatility |
| NZ tax structure | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return. |
| Currency hedging | Hedged to NZD | Hedged to NZD | Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost. |
| Responsible investment screening | No | Yes | Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO. |
| Available via | Direct | Direct | Platforms accepting retail subscriptions. |