Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Russell Investments Global Shares FundvsRussell Investments Hedged Global Shares Fund

Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

How much do these two overlap?

They hold 2 of the same securities. If you held both, roughly 0.0% of your money would be in the same companies — so the diversification you get from holding the pair is smaller than holding two funds suggests.

0.0%
Shared holdingRussell InvestmentsRussell InvestmentsMin weight
sprouts farmers market0.01%0.01%0.01%
Nissan Chemical Corp0.01%0.01%0.01%

Min weight is the smaller of the two weightings — if you hold both funds, that is the floor of your exposure to that position. Direct holdings only: anything either fund holds through an underlying fund or ETF is not counted, so the real overlap can only be higher. From each fund's FMA Disclose full portfolio filing.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

Russell Investments Global Shares Fund

Russell Investments Hedged Global Shares Fund

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is currency hedging. The Russell Investments Global Shares Fund carries its international equity exposure unhedged against the New Zealand dollar, while the Russell Investments Hedged Global Shares Fund uses currency hedging to reduce foreign exchange fluctuation in returns. This distinction drives the most visible divergence in the data: despite near-identical underlying portfolios and growth asset allocations (both at 98.31%), the unhedged fund carries a risk indicator of 4 compared to the hedged fund's risk indicator of 5 on the FMA's seven-point scale. That higher risk rating for the hedged fund reflects the additional complexity and volatility introduced by derivative positions used to manage currency exposure, not greater equity risk per se.

The five-year return difference is also notable — the unhedged fund returned 11.07% per annum against 6.93% for the hedged fund — though this gap reflects the period's currency movements rather than a persistent structural advantage, and future currency conditions may reverse the relationship entirely. Annual fund charges are almost identical at 0.93% and 0.92% respectively. Both funds share the same top holdings in near-identical proportions, dominated by an S&P 500 futures position, Taiwan Semiconductor, Microsoft, and Nvidia, suggesting the two portfolios are managed to the same underlying equity strategy. Fund size differs modestly: NZD 351.4 million unhedged versus NZD 301.5 million hedged. Both funds share the same PDS document on FMA Disclose.

Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this comparison.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.93% vs 0.92%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 84 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Russell Investments

0.93%

Upper half of cohort

Russell Investments

0.92%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Russell Investments

11.07%

Top 22% over 5 years

Russell Investments

6.93%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Russell Investments

NZ$351m

Largest 21% in cohort

Russell Investments

NZ$301m

Largest 23% in cohort

MetricRussell InvestmentsRussell InvestmentsLower / higher is
Annual fund charge0.93%0.92%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)45Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.11.07%6.93%Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$351mNZ$301mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split98% / 2%98% / 2%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging—Hedged to NZDHedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

What each fund says it does

Russell Investments

Russell Investments Global Shares Fund

The underlying investment exposure is predominantly to a broad range of international shares listed on stock exchanges in developed markets and emerging international markets. The Fund employs certain investment exclusions, please refer to the SIPO for further details. Derivatives may be used to obtain or reduce exposure to securities and markets, to implement investment strategies and to manage risk.
Full Russell Investments Russell Investments Global Shares Fund profile →

Russell Investments

Russell Investments Hedged Global Shares Fund

The underlying investment exposure is predominantly to a broad range of international shares listed on stock exchanges in developed markets as well as emerging international markets. The Fund employs certain investment exclusions, please refer to the SIPO for further details. Derivatives may be used to obtain or reduce exposure to securities and markets, to implement investment strategies and to manage risk. The Fund targets a position of being fully hedged back to New Zealand Dollars. Due to active currency management by the underlying managers, there will genera
Full Russell Investments Russell Investments Hedged Global Shares Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Russell Investments Global Shares Fund and the Russell Investments Hedged Global Shares Fund?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.93% vs 0.92%).
Which fund has lower fees, Russell Investments Global Shares Fund or Russell Investments Hedged Global Shares Fund?
Russell Investments Hedged Global Shares Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.92% p.a. vs 0.93% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Russell Investments Global Shares Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 11.07% and Russell Investments Hedged Global Shares Fund's is 6.93% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.