Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

Booster Wealth Moderate FundvsSBS Wealth High Growth Strategy

Booster Wealth Moderate Fund (fund size NZ$2.8 million, annual fund charge 0.74%) and SBS Wealth High Growth Strategy (fund size NZ$2.6 million, annual fund charge 1.22%) are both diversified managed funds, as shown on Sorted Smart Investor on 22 May 2026 and 12 October 2026 respectively; for the year to 31 March 2026 their 1-year returns after fees and tax were 2.70% and 10.79%, per their quarterly fund updates filed on FMA Disclose.

What's different at a glance

  • Booster Wealth Moderate Fund charges 0.48% lower in annual fund charges (0.74% vs 1.22%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 68 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Booster

0.74%

Lowest 21% of cohort

SBS Wealth

1.22%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Booster

—

—

SBS Wealth

—

—

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Booster

NZ$3m

Smallest 8% in cohort

SBS Wealth

NZ$3m

Smallest 5% in cohort

MetricBoosterSBS WealthLower / higher is
Annual fund charge0.74%1.22%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)45Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.——Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$3mNZ$3mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split53% / 47%98% / 2%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

3

of each fund's top 10

Booster weight in shared

8.6%

of Booster Wealth Moderate Fund top 10 is shared

SBS Wealth weight in shared

8.4%

of SBS Wealth High Growth Strategy top 10 is shared

HoldingBoosterSBS Wealth
NCNZ Cash (BNZ Bank Trust Account)NZ
5.98%3.78%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation LimitedFisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation LimitedNZ
1.57%2.60%
NVIDIA CorpNVIDIA CorpUS
1.06%1.98%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Booster

Booster Wealth Moderate Fund

The Wealth Moderate Fund is suited to investors who seek moderate returns on average over medium term periods (three years plus), allowing for some shorter-term ups and downs, whilst excluding investments which do not satisfy certain responsible investment criteria. We aim to achieve this by investing mainly in income assets, while including a moderate allocation of growth assets, and the application of our Approach to Responsible Investing policy.
Full Booster Booster Wealth Moderate Fund profile →

SBS Wealth

SBS Wealth High Growth Strategy

The Strategy aims to achieve higher capital growth and returns over the long term. The Strategy invests into the following SBS Wealth funds: 75% into the World Equity Portfolio; and 25% into the Australasian Equity Portfolio.
Full SBS Wealth SBS Wealth High Growth Strategy profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Booster Wealth Moderate Fund and the SBS Wealth High Growth Strategy?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Booster Wealth Moderate Fund charges 0.48% lower in annual fund charges (0.74% vs 1.22%).
Which fund has lower fees, Booster Wealth Moderate Fund or SBS Wealth High Growth Strategy?
Booster Wealth Moderate Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.74% p.a. vs 1.22% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.