Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International FI

Evidential Sustainable Global Bond FundvsRussell Investments Global Fixed Interest Fund

Evidential Sustainable Global Bond Fund (fund size NZ$600.2 million, annual fund charge 0.32%) and Russell Investments Global Fixed Interest Fund (fund size NZ$564.0 million, annual fund charge 0.58%) are both international fixed interest managed funds, as shown on Sorted Smart Investor on 22 May 2026; for the year to 31 March 2026 their 1-year returns after fees and tax were 1.52% and 1.08%, per their quarterly fund updates filed on FMA Disclose.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

Evidential Sustainable Global Bond Fund

No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.

Russell Investments Global Fixed Interest Fund

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is cost. The Evidential Sustainable Global Bond Fund charges an annual fund fee of 0.32%, while the Russell Investments Global Fixed Interest Fund charges 0.58% — a gap of 26 basis points that compounds meaningfully over time in a fixed income context where net returns are inherently modest.

Both funds sit in the International Fixed Income category, share an identical risk indicator of 4 on the standard 1–7 scale, report near-identical fund sizes (approximately NZD 564 million and NZD 600 million respectively), and both hold 0.07% in growth assets, making their defensive income profiles structurally comparable.

On returns, Russell Investments discloses a five-year annualised return of 0.34% as at its latest Quarterly Fund Update. Evidential's five-year return figure is not available in our snapshot — the fund appears to lack a sufficient performance history to generate that metric — so a like-for-like return comparison cannot be made.

Portfolio composition signals different approaches to sovereign and quasi-sovereign credit. Russell's disclosed top holdings are dominated by US Treasuries and cash positions, while Evidential's top holdings show named sovereign and sub-sovereign issuers spanning Canada, the United Kingdom, France, and Belgium, suggesting a more geographically diversified European and Commonwealth tilt with explicit ESG-screening implied by the "Sustainable" label.

Both managers publish a Product Disclosure Statement on FMA Disclose; the Russell PDS URL in our data references a Sustainable Global Shares document, which readers should confirm is the correct governing document for this fund.

Always verify current fees, returns, and portfolio details against each fund's latest Quarterly Fund Update and PDS on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Evidential Sustainable Global Bond Fund charges 0.26% lower in annual fund charges (0.32% vs 0.58%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Evidential Sustainable Global Bond Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 31 international fi funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Evidential

0.32%

Lowest 19% of cohort

Russell Investments

0.58%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Evidential

—

—

Russell Investments

0.34%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Evidential

NZ$600m

Largest 8% in cohort

Russell Investments

NZ$564m

Largest 11% in cohort

MetricEvidentialRussell InvestmentsLower / higher is
Annual fund charge0.32%0.58%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)44Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.—0.34%Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$600mNZ$564mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split0% / 100%0% / 100%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningYesNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Evidential

Evidential Sustainable Global Bond Fund

The Fund provides investors with exposure to a diversified portfolio of intermediate term global fixed interest and money market securities whilst taking into account certain environmental and social considerations. The Fund aims to hedge all foreign currency exposure to the New Zealand dollar.
Full Evidential Evidential Sustainable Global Bond Fund profile →

Russell Investments

Russell Investments Global Fixed Interest Fund

The underlying investment exposure is predominantly to debt securities issued by supranationals, international governments, quasi-government agencies and corporates as well as structured credit securities including mortgage-backed and asset backed securities. The underlying investment portfolio may also be exposed to low grade or unrated debt securities, emerging market securities and currency. The Fund employs certain investment exclusions, please refer to the SIPO for further details. Derivatives may be used to obtain or reduce exposure to securities and markets
Full Russell Investments Russell Investments Global Fixed Interest Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Evidential Sustainable Global Bond Fund and the Russell Investments Global Fixed Interest Fund?
Both are international fi funds available to NZ retail investors. Evidential Sustainable Global Bond Fund charges 0.26% lower in annual fund charges (0.32% vs 0.58%).
Which fund has lower fees, Evidential Sustainable Global Bond Fund or Russell Investments Global Fixed Interest Fund?
Evidential Sustainable Global Bond Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.32% p.a. vs 0.58% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — Evidential Sustainable Global Bond Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Russell Investments Global Fixed Interest Fund does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.