Fund-vs-fund · International Equities
Mercer Core Global Shares Fund vs Pathfinder Global Responsibility Fund
Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.
Why these two differ
The most material structural difference between these two funds is their investment philosophy and resulting portfolio construction. The Pathfinder Global Responsibility Fund applies a responsible investment screen, concentrating on environmental and infrastructure-oriented companies — its top five holdings include Veolia Environnement (8.22%), Pentair Inc (7.78%), Ebara Corp (6.71%), CIA Saneamento Basico DE-ADR (5.82%), and Ferguson PLC (5.04%), reflecting a thematic tilt toward water, waste, and utilities. The Mercer Core Global Shares Fund takes a broad-market international equities approach, with its top five dominated by US mega-cap technology: Nvidia (5.15%), Apple (4.82%), Microsoft (3.21%), Alphabet Class A (2.53%), and Amazon (2.27%). This philosophical divergence almost certainly explains the significant return gap over the five years captured in each fund's latest QFU: Mercer returned 13.93% per annum against Pathfinder's 4.97% — a period during which US tech significantly outperformed global markets. Both funds share an identical growth-assets allocation of 98.31% and the same risk indicator of 5 (on a scale of 1 to 7), making them structurally comparable in asset-class composition and volatility classification. Fund sizes are similarly close — Mercer at NZD 60.9 million, Pathfinder at NZD 63.9 million. Fees differ modestly: Mercer charges 1.24% annually versus Pathfinder's 1.30%. Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account product based on the data provided. Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this summary.
Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.
What's different at a glance
- Mercer Core Global Shares Fund charges 0.06% lower in annual fund charges (1.24% vs 1.30%).
- Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
- Pathfinder Global Responsibility Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.
Where each fund sits in its cohort
Percentile rank vs all 81 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.
Annual fund charge
Lower is better
Mercer
1.24%
Highest 19% of cohort
Pathfinder
1.30%
Highest 15% of cohort
5-year return p.a.
Past performance — not a predictor
Mercer
13.93%
Top 6% over 5 years
Pathfinder
4.97%
Bottom 21% over 5 years
Fund size
Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Mercer
NZ$61m
Lower half by size
Pathfinder
NZ$64m
Lower half by size
| Metric | Mercer | Pathfinder | Lower / higher is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fund charge | 1.24% | 1.30% | Lower is better |
| Risk indicator (1–7) | 5 | 5 | Higher = more volatility |
| 5-year return p.a. | 13.93% | 4.97% | Higher is better (past not future) |
| Fund size | NZ$61m | NZ$64m | Larger = more stable, lower close-risk |
| Growth / income split | 98% / 2% | 98% / 2% | More growth = higher long-run return + volatility |
| NZ tax structure | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return. |
| Currency hedging | — | — | Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost. |
| Responsible investment screening | No | Yes | Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO. |
| Available via | Direct | Direct | Platforms accepting retail subscriptions. |
Portfolio overlap
How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.
What each fund says it does
Mercer
Mercer Core Global Shares Fund
The fund invests in shares listed on share markets predominately in developed economies. The portfolio uses multiple managers and is diversified by region, manager and investment approaches. Environmental, Social and Governance characteristics are integrated into the underlying investment managers’ investment processes. The fund aims to provide a Gross Return above the return of the MSCI World Index with net dividends reinvested (in NZD) on a rolling three-year basis.Full Mercer Mercer Core Global Shares Fund profile →
Pathfinder
Pathfinder Global Responsibility Fund
The Fund invests in companies connected to water quality, accessibility or sustainability1 that satisfy Pathfinder’s ethical investment criteria. The Fund’s investments are managed by Nordea Investment Management AB.Full Pathfinder Pathfinder Global Responsibility Fund profile →
Documents
Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →
Pathfinder
LiveLast verified 2026-05-08
Common questions
What's the difference between the Mercer Core Global Shares Fund and the Pathfinder Global Responsibility Fund?
Which fund has lower fees, Mercer Core Global Shares Fund or Pathfinder Global Responsibility Fund?
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
