Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Manager head-to-head

Octagon vs Smartshares

Two NZ fund managers, side by side: retail fund lineups, median fees, median 5-year after-fee returns and assets under management — every figure from FMA Disclose data. No winner declared; the numbers are the comparison.

Octagon logo

Octagon

Retail funds
3
Median fee
1.17%
Median 5y return
3.18%
Tracked AUM
NZ$321m
Smartshares logo

Smartshares

Retail funds
33
Median fee
0.54%
Median 5y return
8.47%
Tracked AUM
NZ$5.4b

Medians span different asset classes and risk levels — they are context, not a ranking. The per-category table below compares like with like. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Median fee where both compete

Category Octagon Smartshares
Australasian Equities 1.17% (2) 0.54% (11)

Octagon — largest funds

Smartshares — largest funds

Common questions

Which charges lower fees — Octagon or Smartshares?

Across funds with a reported annual fund charge, the median is 1.17% for Octagon and 0.54% for Smartshares. Medians hide spread — the per-category table on this page compares like with like, and each fund page shows its exact charge with the source document.

Which has performed better?

The median reported 5-year after-fees return is 3.18% across Octagon's funds and 8.47% across Smartshares's. These medians mix different asset classes and risk levels, so they are context, not a verdict — compare same-category funds on the leaderboard, and remember past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Where do these figures come from?

Annual fund charges, 5-year returns and fund sizes are mirrored from FMA Disclose register data via Sorted Smart Investor. Every fund page linked from this comparison shows the underlying disclosure documents.

Mechanical comparison of disclosed figures — no opinion or recommendation. ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Read each fund's current PDS and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.