ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Listed Property

Mint Australasian Property Fund vs Summer Listed Property

Both are Listed Property funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is size: Mint Australasian Property Fund holds approximately NZD 19.3 million in assets under management, roughly 2.6 times the NZD 7.6 million held by Summer Listed Property. A smaller fund can carry higher per-unit operational costs and potentially greater sensitivity to large redemptions, though neither fund's QFU commentary addresses this directly.

On fees, the gap is narrow — Summer charges 1.02% per annum against Mint's 1.04% — a difference unlikely to be material in isolation. Both funds carry a risk indicator of 5 on the standard 1–7 scale and allocate nearly all assets to growth (Summer 98.37%, Mint 98.31%), so their structural risk profiles are closely matched.

The more notable divergence is in reported five-year returns: Summer shows 2.69% per annum against Mint's 0.89% per annum. Both figures are after-fees but before tax, and the gap warrants scrutiny of differing inception dates, portfolio construction choices, and any periods of cash drag or repositioning — none of which are fully explained within the QFU data available in this snapshot.

Portfolio overlap is substantial. Precinct Properties, Goodman Property Trust, Kiwi Property Group, and Vital Healthcare appear in both funds' top five. Mint's top five includes Stride Property where Summer holds Property For Industry, pointing to modest differentiation at the margin rather than a fundamentally distinct strategy.

Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account vehicle based on the data provided here; verify fund type, structure, and current figures against each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Summer Listed Property charges 0.05% lower in annual fund charges (1.02% vs 1.07%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Mint Australasian Property Fund is roughly 2.2× the size of the other fund.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 15 listed property funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Mint

1.07%

Upper half of cohort

Summer

1.02%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Mint

2.51%

Lower half over 5 years

Summer

2.69%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Mint

NZ$17m

Smallest 23% in cohort

Summer

NZ$8m

Smallest 10% in cohort

Metric Mint Summer Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.07% 1.02% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 2.51% 2.69% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$17m NZ$8m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via InvestNow · Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

6

of each fund's top 10

Mint weight in shared

65.7%

of Mint Australasian Property Fund top 10 is shared

Summer weight in shared

60.2%

of Summer Listed Property top 10 is shared

Holding Mint Summer
GP Goodman Property Trust NZ
18.69% 18.17%
Kiwi Property Group Ltd Kiwi Property Group Ltd NZ
16.60% 14.58%
PF Property for Industry Ltd NZ
13.75% 9.08%
Vital Healthcare Property Trust Vital Healthcare Property Trust NZ
8.24% 8.63%
Argosy Property Trust Argosy Property Trust NZ
6.20% 8.46%
Summerset Group Holdings Ltd Summerset Group Holdings Ltd NZ
2.25% 1.32%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Mint

Mint Australasian Property Fund

The Fund invests predominantly in Australasian listed property and property-related equities. The Fund is benchmarked against the S&P/NZX All Real Estate (Industry Group) Gross Index with an investment objective of outperforming the benchmark after fees and expenses, over the medium to long term.
Full Mint Mint Australasian Property Fund profile →

Summer

Summer Listed Property

The Summer Listed Property fund invests in listed financial products issued by entities whose principal business involves the owning or managing of property, property-like assets or real assets. We aim to achieve long-term returns (before fees, taxes and other expenses) greater than the S&P/NZX All Real Estate Gross with Imputation Index.
Full Summer Summer Listed Property profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Mint Australasian Property Fund and the Summer Listed Property?
Both are listed property funds available to NZ retail investors. Summer Listed Property charges 0.05% lower in annual fund charges (1.02% vs 1.07%).
Which fund has lower fees, Mint Australasian Property Fund or Summer Listed Property?
Summer Listed Property has the lower annual fund charge (1.02% p.a. vs 1.07% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Mint Australasian Property Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 2.51% and Summer Listed Property's is 2.69% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.